Preview

The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine

Advanced search

Clinical and Pathogenetic Aspects of the Course of Peptic Ulcer Disease with Concomitant Duodenal Stasis

https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2020-10-3-209-216

Abstract

Objective: to assess the characteristics of the course of peptic ulcer in combination with duodenostasis (DS) according to clinical, electrophysiological, and morphological studies.

Materials and methods. The study included 169 patients with duodenal ulcer, of which two groups were formed: the observation group consisted of 107 patients with duodenostasis-associated duodenostasis, the comparison group included 62 patients with duodenal ulcer without concomitant duodenostasis-associated duodenostasis. The control group consisted of 30 practically healthy individuals who did not have complaints from the gastrointestinal tract. The results of clinical, objective studies, and laboratory and instrumental data were used in the verification of YB and duodenostasis-associated duodenostasis. To study the closing function of the gatekeeper, the ratio of intraduodenal pressure to intrahastral pressure was used. To study the acid-forming function of the stomach was used device “Gastroscan-5M”, engine — gastroenterological GEM-01 “Gastroscan-GEM” (“Istok-System”, Fryazino). The mucus-forming function was studied using a Sialo Test (research and production center (RPC) “Eco-Service”, Saint Petersburg).

Results. In patients with ulcer with concomitant DS, the duration of ulcerative history was longer — 10,2 ± 1.2 years than in patients with ulcer without concomitant DS — 9,6 ± 1.3 years (p = 0,041). Complications were revealed in 33 (30.8%) patients with ulcer with concomitant DS, in 4 (6,4%) patients with ulcer without concomitant DS (χ 2 = 20,9, p = 0,017). Patients in the observation group were more likely to have erosive-ulcerative lesions of the mucosa than in the comparison group (86 (81,2%) and 23 (37,8%) patients, respectively (χ 2 = 33,4, p <0,001). pressure to intragastric in patients of the observation group was significantly reduced in relation to the control group (p = 0,001). In case of YAB with duodenal ulcer with DS according to Gastroscan-HEM, the Pi / Ps coefficient (stomach) postprandially increased by 3,5 times compared with the control In patients of the observation group, the overall level of sialic acids significantly prevailed over firs in the control group (p <0,001) and the comparison group (p <0,001).

Conclusion. Concomitant duodenostasis, acting on the main etiopathogenetic links of ulcerogenesis, aggravates the course of peptic ulcer disease, increases the frequency of its complications.

About the Authors

Ya. M. Vakhrushev
Izhevsk State Medical Academy» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Competing Interests: not


M. S. Busygina
Izhevsk State Medical Academy» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Marina S. Busygina - Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine with a nursing course.

Izhevsk


Competing Interests: not


References

1. Sheptulin A.A. Peptic ulcer: keep up with the times. Crimean therapeutic journal. 2015; 1: 5-10. [in Russian].

2. Sukovatykh B.S., Gureev I.I., Novomlinets Y.P. et al. Long-term results of surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease complicated by perforation. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin «Man and His Health». 2017; 3: 30-36. doi: 10.21626/vestnik/2017-3/05. [in Russian].

3. Boichuk V. The role of pepsinogenes and some intestinal hormones in pathogenesis of duodenogastral reflux. Eureka: health sciences. 2018; 1: 3-8. doi:10.21303/2504-5679.2018.00538.

4. Maev I.V., Gelenchenko Yu.S., Andreev D.N. et al. Duodenogastro-esophageal reflux: clinical significance and approaches to therapy. Consilium Medicum. 2014; 16(8): 5-8. [in Russian].

5. Samigullin M.F., Muravev V.Yu., Ivanov A.I. Endoscopic diagnosis of motor disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Medical Almanac. 2008; 2: 33-4. [in Russian].

6. Ivashkin VT., Sheptulin A.A., Maev I.V. Clinical recommendations of the Russian gastroenterological Association for the diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease. ROS journal of gastroenterology gepatol koloproktol. 2016; 26(6): 40-54. doi:10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-6-40-54 [in Russian].

7. Mikheev A.G., Rakitin B.V., Trifonov M.M. the Current state of pH-metry of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Medico-technical technologies on the guard of health («MEDTECH-2016»). 2016;175-8. [in Russian].

8. Menshikov V.V. Clinical laboratory diagnostics: national guide in 2 volumes. M., Geotar — Media. 2013; 808 p. [in Russian].

9. Bunova S.S., Rybkina L.B., Bakalov I.A. et al. Methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: current status of the issue. Young scientist. 2012; 12: 540-3. [in Russian].

10. Vakhrushev Ya M., Busygina M.S., Afanasieva T.S. Clinical and pathogenetic analysis of the course of gastric ulcer in concomitant chronic duodenal insufficiency. Vyatka medical Bulletin. 2018; 1(57): 4-9.

11. Vakhrushev Y.M., Busygina M.S. Features of the clinical course of peptic ulcer with concomitant duodenal insufficiency. Archive of Internal Medicine. 2016; 6(4): 30-6. doi:10.20514/2226-6704-2016-6-4-30-35. [in Russian].

12. Smirnova G.O., Siluyanov S.V., Stupin V.A. Peripheral electrogastroenterography in clinical practice: Manual for doctors. M., Pirogov Medical University. 2009; 19 p. [in Russian].

13. Михайлусов С.В., Барт Б.Я., Михайлусова М.П. Дуоденогастраль-ный рефлюкс: особенности клинического течения. Вестник ДГМА. 2018; 1(26): 32-9.

14. Mikhailusov S.V., Bart B.Ya., Mikhailusova M.P. Duodenogastric reflux: clinical features. Herald of the DSEA. 2018; 1(26): 32-9. [in Russian].

15. Lapina T.L., Kartavenko I.M., Ivashkin V.T. Pathogenic and therapeutic role of bile acids at reflux-gastritis. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2015; 25(1): 86-93. [in Russian].

16. Chung C.S., Chiang T.H., Lee Y.C. A systematic approach for the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic peptic ulcers. Korean J Intern Med. 2015; 30(5): 559-70. doi:10.3904/kjim.2015.30.5.559.

17. Leushina E.A., Chicherina E.N. A modern understanding of motor — evacuation disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract (literature review). Therapist. 2015; 8: 4-9. [in Russian].

18. Mazurenko N.N., Zablodsky A.N., Tovstashov A.L. Duodenoga stric reflux and Helicobacter pylori: morphological assessment in children. Evidence-based gastroenterology. 2016; 5(3): 3-9. doi: 10.17116/dokgastro2016533-9 [in Russian].

19. Stepanov Yu.M., Kovalenko O.M., Oshmyanska N.Yu. The importance of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in the morphological diagnosis of patients with chronic reflux gastritis. Gastroenterology. 2017; 51(1): 1-7, doi: 10.22141/2308-2097.51.1.2017.97865. [in Russian].

20. Aruin L.I. The quality of healing of gastroduodenal ulcers: functional morphology, the role of pathogenetic therapy methods. Suchas gastroenterology. 2015; 5(73): 92-103. [in Russian].


Review

For citations:


Vakhrushev Ya.M., Busygina M.S. Clinical and Pathogenetic Aspects of the Course of Peptic Ulcer Disease with Concomitant Duodenal Stasis. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2020;10(3):209-216. https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2020-10-3-209-216

Views: 1435


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-6704 (Print)
ISSN 2411-6564 (Online)