Лечение коронарного атеросклероза: влияние массового применения стентов на ближайшие и отдаленные результаты коронарной ангиопластики
https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2011-0-1-35-43
Abstract
We report a prospective analysis of immediate and long-term effects of two coronary angioplasty methods – balloon dilation and stenting – in different working periods of two endovascular laboratories. For the last 10 years the number of stents implanted has grown 30-fold, and stenting is used today in 95% to 97% of coronary angioplasty procedures. The strategy of massive use of stents has improved the immediate outcomes of angioplasty as seen by substantial decrease of the rate of acute myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and acute coronary occlusions (from 2.7% after balloon angioplasty to 0.6% after stenting, р = 0.001). Stenting improved the long-term prognosis by decreasing the frequency of cardiovascular events. The 5-year survival rate after stenting was 98.8%, after balloon angioplasty — 92.7% (р = 0.004). However, the rate to angiographically revealed restenosis and the need for repeated myocardium revascularization after stenting (27.1 and 30.4%) decrease less significantly compared to balloon angioplasty (30.1 vs. 34.5%, р = 0.0025).
About the Authors
А. М. БабунашвилиRussian Federation
кафедра госпитальной хирургии, Москва
В. А. Иванов
Russian Federation
отделение ангиографии, Красногорск
Д. П. Дундуа
Russian Federation
кафедра госпитальной хирургии, Москва
З. А. Кавтеладзе
Russian Federation
кафедра госпитальной хирургии, Москва
Д. С. Карташов
Russian Federation
кафедра госпитальной хирургии, Москва
Е. Н. Новичкова
Russian Federation
кафедра госпитальной хирургии, Москва
И. Е. Юдин
Russian Federation
кафедра госпитальной хирургии, Москва
References
1. Бабунашвили А.М., Иванов В.А. Улучшение геометрии просвета коронарной артерии путем чрескожной эндоваскулярной имплантации спиралевидного стента после баллонной коронарной ангиопластики // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 1995. № 5. С. 68–70.
2. Беркович О.А., Беляева О.Д., Баженова Е.А. и др. Влияние статинов на функциональное состояние эндотелия сосудов у больных ишемической болезнью сердца // Русский медицинский журнал. 2002. Т. 10. № 19. С. 874–876.
3. Almagor Y., Borrione M., Maiello L. et al. Coronary stenting after recanalization of chronic total occlusions // Circulation. 1993. № 88. Р. 1-504.
4. Antoniucci D., Valenti R., Santoro G.M. et al. Restenosis after coronary stenting in current clinical practice // Am. Heart J. 1998. № 135. Р. 510–518.
5. Catala I. Is stent design affecting the biologic response? In: “Endovascular Therapy Daily”. Paris, 1997. Р. 2.
6. Colombo A., Hall P., Nakamura S.et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance // Circulation. 1995. № 91. Р. 1676–1688.
7. Cowley M.G., Dorros G., Kelsey S.F. et al. Acute coronary events associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty // Am. J. Cardiol. 1984. № 53. Р. 12C.
8. Endovascular therapy course coronary and peripheral (Eight complex Coronary Angioplasty Course), ed. by J. Marco, J. Fajadet, M-C. Morice, A. Pichard, N. Reifart. Paris, 1997. Р. 64.
9. De Feyter PJ., van den Brand M., Laarman G. et al. Acute coronary artery occlusion during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Frequency, prediction, clinical course management and follow-up // Circulation. 1991. № 83. Р. 927–936.
10. Freed M., O’Neill W.W., Safian R.D. Dissection and acute closure. In: “The new manual of interventional Cardiology”, ed. by M. Freed, R. Safian, C. Grines. Birmingham, Michigan: Physician press, 1994. P. 366.
11. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group // Lancet. 2002. № 360. Р. 7–22.
12. Hermans W.R., Rensing B.J., Kelder C.J. et al. Postangioplasty restenosis rate between segments of the major coronary arteries // Am. J. Cardiol. 1992. № 66. Р. 194–200.
13. Hillegass W.B., Ohman E.M., Califf R.M. Restenosis: The clinical issues. In: Textbook of the interventional cardiology, ed. by E. Topol, 2nd edition. W.B. Saunders Co., 1994. Vol. 1. Р. 415–435.
14. Hoffmann R., Mintz G.S., Dussaillant G.R. et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study // Circulation. 1996. № 94. Р. 1247–1254.
15. Lablanche J-M., McFadden E.P., Bonnett J-L. et al. Combined antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine and aspirin. A simplified approach to intracoronary stent management // Eur. Heart J. 1996. № 17. Р. 1373–1380.
16. Lincoff M.A., Furst J.G., Ellis S.G. et al. Sustained local delivery of dexamethasone by a novel intravascular eluting stent to prevent restenosis in the porcine coronary injury model // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1997. № 29. Р. 808–810.
17. Macaya C., Serruys P.W., Ruygrok P. et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: One-year clinical follow-up of BeneStent Trial. In: 8-th complex coronary angioplasty course. Paris, 1997. Р. 783–791.
18. Maiello L., Luigi L., Hall P. et al. Results of stent implantation for diffuse coronary artery disease assisted by intravascular ultrasound // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995. № 25. Р. 156A.
19. Meier B. Coronary angioplasty. USA: Grune & Stratton, inc., 1989. 288 p.
20. Nakamura S., Colombo A., Gaglione A. et al. Intracoronary Ultrasound observations during stent implantation // Circulation. 1994. № 89. Р. 2026–2034.
21. Puel J., Juilliere Y., Bertrand M.E. et al. Early and late assessment of stenosis geometry after coronary arterial stenting // Am. J. Cardiol. 1988. № 61. Р. 546–553.
22. Reimers B., Akiyama T., Moussa I. et al. Persistent high restenosis after local delivery of long acting steroids prior to coronary stent implantation // Circulation. 1997. № 96 (Suppl.). Р. I-710.
23. Rogers C., Tseng D.Y., Gingras P.H. et al. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft encapsulation reduces thickening regardless of stent design // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998. № 31 (Suppl. A). Р. 413A.
24. Safian R.D. Coronary stents. In: The new manual of interventional Cardiology, ed. by M. Freed, R. Safian, C. Grines. Birmingham, Michigan: Physician press, 1994. Р. 481.
25. Savage M., Fischmann D., Schatz R. et al. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after implantation of a balloon-expandable stent in the native coronary circulation // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1994. № 24. Р. 1207–1212.
26. De Scheerder I.K., Wang K., Keelan M.H. et al. First clinical experience with intravascular low power red laser light therapy for prevention of restenosis following coronary stenting // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998. № 31 (Suppl.). Р. 143A.
27. Serruys P.W., de Jaegere P.P.T., Kiemeneij F. et al. for the Benestent study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease // N. Engl. J. Med. 1994. № 331. Р. 489–495.
28. Serruys P.W., De Jaegere P.P.T., Kiemeneij F. et al. Comparison of balloonexpandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease // N. Engl. J. of Med. 1994. № 331. Р. 489–495.
29. Serruys P.W., Juilliere Y., Bertrand M.E.et al. Additional improvement of stenosis geometry in human coronary arteries by stenting after balloon dilatation // Am. J. Cardiol. 1988. № 61 (Suppl. G). Р. 71G–76G.
30. Strauss B.H., Serruys P.W., Bertrand M.E. et al. Quantitative angiographic follow-up of the coronary Wallstent in native vessels and venous bypass grafts (European Experience March 1986-March 1990) // Am. J. Cardiol. 1992. № 69. Р. 475–481.
31. Teirstein J., Schatz R.A., Russo R. et al. Coronary stenting of small diameter vessels: is it safe? // Circulation. 1995. № 92. Р. 1–281.
Review
For citations:
Бабунашвили А.М., Иванов В.А., Дундуа Д.П., Кавтеладзе З.А., Карташов Д.С., Новичкова Е.Н., Юдин И.Е. Лечение коронарного атеросклероза: влияние массового применения стентов на ближайшие и отдаленные результаты коронарной ангиопластики. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2011;(1):35-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2011-0-1-35-43