Regulation of the Immune System in Aging: Focus on Epigenetic Mechanisms
https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2022-12-1-35-44
Abstract
Epigenetics studies processes leading to changes in the activity of genes without changing the DNA sequence. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, are formed during embryonic development, and epigenetic profiles are stably inherited in mitosis, providing cell differentiation and their further fate in the development process. Under the influence of internal and external factors such as metabolic profile, hormones, nutrition, drugs, smoking and stress, epigenetic mechanisms are actively modulated and, in this sense, a lifestyle can significantly affect the epigenome, and consequently, the gene expression profile and function of cells. It is shown that the development and function of cells of both congenital and adaptive immune systems are also regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, and negative epigenetic changes are a distinctive feature of aging and cancer. Given these data, it can be assumed that age-related changes in the profile of epigenetic labels can lead to a decrease in immune function and contribute to an increase in morbidity in the elderly. Therefore, to ensure healthy aging, better understanding of how to avoid epigenetic changes that are associated with aging of the immune system is needed. In this review, we tried to generalize the latest achievements in this field of research and consider the possibility of using them for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of diseases.
About the Authors
K. A. AitbaevKyrgyzstan
Bishkek
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
I. T. Murkamilov
Kyrgyzstan
Ilkhom T. Murkamilov
Bishkek
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Zh. A. Murkamilova
Kyrgyzstan
Bishkek
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
I. O. Kudaibergenova
Kyrgyzstan
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
F. A. Yusupov
Kyrgyzstan
Osh
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
1. Aitbaev K.A., Murkamilov I.T., Fomin V.V. Molecular mechanisms of aging: the role of oxidative stress and epigenetic modifications. Advances in Gerontology. 2019; 32:1-2: 20-28. [in Russian]
2. Moskalev A.A. Aging and genes. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 2008; 358 p. [in Russian]
3. Harman D. Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. Journal of Gerontology 1956; 11: 298–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/11.3.298
4. Skulachev V.P. Phenomena of programmed death. Mitochondria, cells and organs: the role of reactive oxygen species. Soros Educational Journal 2001; 7 (6): 4-10. [in Russian]
5. Walford RL. Immunologic aspects of aging. Klin. Wochenschr. 1969; 47(11): 599-605.
6. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Research 2011; 21(3): 381-395.
7. Li E, Zhang Y. DNA methylation in mammals. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014; 6(5): a019133. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019133
8. Allis CD, Jenuwein T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat Rev Genet 2016; 17:487–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.59
9. Strahl BD, Allis CD. The Language of Covalent Histone Modifications. Nature 2000; 403: 41-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/47412
10. Villeneuve LM, Natarajan R. The role of epigenetics in the pathology of diabetic complications. American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology. 2010; 299: F14–F25.
11. Barbot W, Dupressoir A, Lazar V, Heidmann T. Epigenetic regulation of an IAP retrotransposon in the aging mouse: progressive demethylation and de-silencing of the element by its repetitive induction. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 30: 2365–2373. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.11.2365
12. Wei L, Liu B, Tuo J, et al. Hypomethylation of the IL17RC promoter associates with age-related macular degeneration. Cell Rep 2012; 2(5): 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.013
13. Yuan T, Jiao Y, Jong S, et al. An integrative multi-scale analysis of the dynamic DNA methylation landscape in aging. PLoS Genet 2015; 11(2):e1004996. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004996
14. Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell 2013; 49(2): 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
15. Fernández AF, Bayón GF, Urdinguio RG, et al. H3K4me1 marks DNA regions hypomethylated during aging in human stem and differentiated cells. Genome Res 2015; 25(1): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.169011.113
16. Gevry N, Chan HM, Laflamme L, Livingston DM, Gaudreau L. p21 transcription is regulated by differential localization of histone H2A.Z. Genes Dev 2007; 21: 1869–1881. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1545707
17. Kreiling JA, Tamamori-Adachi M, Sexton AN, et al. Age-associated increase in heterochromatic marks in murine and primate tissues. Aging Cell 2011; 10(2): 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00666.x
18. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102(30): 10604–10609. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500398102
19. Poulsen P, Esteller M, Vaag A, Fraga MF. The epigenetic basis of twin discordance in age-related diseases. Pediatr Res 2007; 61(5Pt2): 38R– 42R. https://doi.org/10.1203/pdr.0b013e31803c7b98
20. Meyer KF, Verkaik-Schakel RN, Timens W, et al. The fetal programming effect of prenatal smoking on Igf1r and Igf1 methylation is organ- and sex-specific. Epigenetics 2017; 21: 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2017.1403691
21. Sharp GC, Arathimos R, Reese SE, et al. Maternal alcohol consumption and offspring DN A methylation: findings from six general population-based birth cohorts. Epigenomics 2018; 10(1): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi-2017-0095
22. Gems D, Partridge L. Stress-response hormesis and aging: “that which does not kill us makes us stronger”. Cell Metab 2 008; 7: 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.01.001
23. Nie B, Gan W, Shi F, et al. Age-dependent accumula tion of 8-oxoguanine in the DNA and RNA in various rat tissues. Oxidative Medicine an d Cellular Longevity 2013; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/303181 PMID 23738036
24. Hamilton ML, Van Remmen H, Drake JA, et al. Does oxidative damage to DNA increase with age? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A. 2001; 98(18): 10469-10474. PMID 11517304
25. Chia N, Wang L, Lu X, et al. Hypothesis: environmental regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine by oxidative stress. Epigenetics 2011; 6(7): 853–856. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.7.16461
26. O’Hagan HM, Wang W, Sen S, et al. Oxidative damage targets complexes containing DNA methyltransferases, SIRT1, and polycomb members to promoter CpG Islands. Cancer Cell 2011; 20(5): 606–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.012
27. Chen D, Steele AD, Lindquist S, Guarente L. Increase in activity during calorie restriction requires Sirt1. Science 2005; 310(5754): 1641. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118357
28. Bauer JA, Pearson KJ, Price NL, et al. Resveratrol improves health and survival of mice on a high-calorie diet. Nature 2006; 444(7117): 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05354
29. Sharma U, Rando OJ. Metabolic input into the epigenome. Cell Metab 2017; 25: 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.02.003
30. Saccani S, Natoli G. Dynamic changes in histone H3 Lys9 methylation occurring at tightly regulated inducible inflammatory genes. Genes Dev 2002; 16: 2219–2224. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.232502
31. Crisan TO, Netea MG, Joosten LAB. Innate immune memory: implications for host responses to damage-associated molecular patterns. Eur J Immunol 2016; 46: 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545497
32. Kleinnijenhuis J, Quintin J, Preijers F, et al. Bacille Calmette-Guerin induces NOD2-dependent nonspecific protection from reinfection via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 17537–17542. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202870109
33. Foster SL, Hargreaves DC, Medzhitov R. Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature 2007; 447: 972–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05836
34. Bullwinkel J, Ludermann A, Debarry J, Singh P.B. Epigenotype switching at the CD14 and CD209 genes during differentiation of human monocytes to dendritic cells. Epigenetics 2011; 6: 45–51. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.1.13314
35. Kuwahara M, Suzuki J, Tofukuji S, et al. The Menin-Bach2 axis is critical for regulating CD4 T-cell senescence and cytokine homeostasis. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3555. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4555
36. Murayama A, Sakura K, Nakama M, et al. A specific CpG site demethylation in the human interleukin 2 gene promoter is an epigenetic memory. EMBO J 2006; 25: 1081–1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601012
37. Maier H, Ostraat R, Gao H, et al. Early B cell factor cooperates with Runx1 and mediates epigenetic changes associated with mb-1 transcription. Nat Immunol 2004; 5(10): 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1119
38. Linderson Y, Eberhard D, Malin S, et al. Corecruitment of the Grg4 repressor by PU.1 is critical for Pax5-mediated repression of B-cell-specific genes. EMBO Rep 2004; 5(3): 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400089
39. Kramer A, Challen GA. The epigenetic basis of hematopoietic stem cell aging. Sem Hematol 2017; 54: 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.10.006
40. Baylis D, Bartlett DB, Patel HP, Roberts HC. Understanding how we age: insights into inflammaging. Longev Healthspan 2013; 2(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-2395-2-8
41. Lepeule J, Baccarelli A, Motta V, et al. Gene promoter methylation is associated with lung function in the elderly: the Normative Aging study. Epigenetics 2012; 7(3): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.7.3.19216
42. Ligthart S, Marzi C, Aslibekyan S, et al. DNA methylation signatures of chronic low-grade inflammation are associated with complex diseases. Genome Biol 2016; 17(1): 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1119-5
43. Heyn H, Li N, Ferreira HJ, et al. Distinct DNA methylation of newborn and centenarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:10522–10527. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120658109
44. Zhao M, Qin J, Yin H, et al. Distinct epigenomes in CD4+T cells of newborns, middle-ages and centenarians. Sci Rep 2016; 6:38411. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38411
45. Dozmorov MG, Coit P, Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Sawalha AH. Ageassociated DNA methylation changes in naive CD4+T cells suggest an evolving autoimmune epigenotype in aging T cells. Epigenomics 2017; 9(4):429–445. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi-2016-0143
46. Zhang Z, Deng C, Lu Q, Richardson B. Age-dependent DNA methylation changes in the ITGAL (CD11a) promoter. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123(9): 1257–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00014-3
47. Johnson ND, Wiener HW, Smith AK, et al. Non-linear patterns in age-related DNA methylation may reflect CD4+ T cell differentiation. Epigenetics 2017; 12(6): 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2017.1314419
48. Garg SK, Delaney C, Toubai T, et al. Aging is associated with increased regulatory T-cell function. Aging Cell 2014; 13(3): 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12191
49. Horvath S, Pirazzini C, Bacalini MG, et al. Decreased epigenetic age of PBMCs from Italian semi-supercentenarians and their offspring. Aging 2015; 7(12): 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100861
50. McEwen LM, Morin AM, Edgar RD, et al. Differential DNA methylation and lymphocyte proportions in a Costa Rican high longevity region. Epigenetics Chromatin 2017; 10: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-017-0128-2
Review
For citations:
Aitbaev K.A., Murkamilov I.T., Murkamilova Zh.A., Kudaibergenova I.O., Yusupov F.A. Regulation of the Immune System in Aging: Focus on Epigenetic Mechanisms. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2022;12(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2022-12-1-35-44