Assessment of the Association Between Clinical and Laboratory Parameters and Past Coronavirus Infection in Patients with Coronary Artery Restenosis
https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2025-15-1-42-56
EDN: NYAGOE
Abstract
Understanding the risk factors for coronary in-stent restenosis is particularly important in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Such patients require careful monitoring, priority treatment, and prevention.
The aim of our study was to assess the association between clinical and laboratory parameters and previous coronavirus infection in patients with coronary artery restenosis.
Materials and methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a continuous sample of patients with coronary artery disease who underwent repeated myocardial revascularization in the period from 2020 to 2023 (931 patients). 420 patients in the main group had coronary artery stent restenosis, of which 162 (38.5 %) had suffered from coronavirus infection (CVI). The control group included 511 patients with repeated myocardial revascularization without stent restenosis, of whom 107 (20.9 %) had undergone CVI. Laboratory tests included troponin I, D-dimer, creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), serum creatinine and glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and fibrinogen, IgG and IgM antibodies to coronavirus and RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction. Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS version 20.0 software.
Results: It was established that there were statistically significantly higher levels of IgG antibodies to coronavirus and C-reactive protein in the main study group compared to the control group. When dividing the study groups into subgroups of individuals with and without previous CVI, statistically significant differences in troponin levels were found (p<0.001): between the level in the group with restenosis and CVI compared to groups without restenosis with CVI, with restenosis without CVI, and in groups with revascularization without CVI and with restenosis without CVI. The levels of D-dimer, CPK, CPK-MB, CRP, and APTT had statistically significant differences in the groups with previous CVI compared to the groups without CVI. The results of multiple regression analysis indicated a statistically significant positive relationship in the study groups between the development of myocardial infarction and such indicators as CRP, blood glucose, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), previous CVI, as well as a negative relationship with left ventricular ejection fraction and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). The role of these predictors in the development of myocardial infarction was confirmed using ROC analysis.
Conclusion: The results of our study indicated a relationship between previous coronavirus infection and an increased risk of coronary artery restenosis in patients with previous myocardial revascularization.
Keywords
About the Authors
G. B. BatenovaKazakhstan
Gulnara B. Batenova — assistant of the Department of Emergency Medicine Semey Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan, cardiologist
Semey
E. I. Dedov
Russian Federation
Evgeniy I. Dedov — professor, rheumatologist
Moscow
A. Yu. Orekhov
Kazakhstan
Andrey Yu. Orekhov — MD, PhD, assistant, cardiologist
Semey
A. A. Dyussupov
Kazakhstan
Altay A. Dyussupov — MD, PhD, proofessor, Rector, angiologist
Semey
D. G. Ygiyeva
Kazakhstan
Diana G. Ygiyeva — assistant of the Department of Emergency Medicine, therapist
Semey
M. R. Pivin
Kazakhstan
Maxim R. Pivin — resident
Semey
A. M. Manatova
Kazakhstan
Almira M. Manatova — PhD, chief Researcher, pediatrician
Astana
L. M. Pivina
Kazakhstan
Lyudmila M. Pivina — MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Emergency Medicine, therapeutist
Semey
References
1. Babunashvili A.M., Ivanov V.A., Dundua D.P., et al. Treatment of coronary atherosclerosis: the effect of mass use of stents on the immediate and remote results of coronary angioplasty. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2011; (1): 35-43 [In Russian].
2. Pleva L., Kukla P., Hlinomaz O. Treatment of coronary instent restenosis: a systematic review. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018; 15(2): 173-184. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.007.
3. Abdrakhmanova A.I., Tsibulkin N.A., Amirov N.B., et al. Painless myocardial ischemia in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2022; 12(3): 165-174 [In Russian]. doi: 10.20514/2226-6704-2022-12-3-165-174
4. Byrne R.A., Joner M., Kastrati A. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Grüntzig Lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(47):3320-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv511
5. Canfield J., Totary-Jain H. 40 Years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: History and Future Directions. J Pers Med. 2018;8(4):33. doi: 10.3390/jpm8040033.
6. Sun J., Yu H., Liu H., et al. Correlation of pre-operative circulating inflammatory cytokines with restenosis and rapid angiographic stenotic progression risk in coronary artery disease patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(3):e23108. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23108.
7. Cornelissen A., Vogt F.J. The effects of stenting on coronary endothelium from a molecular biological view: Time for improvement? J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13936.
8. Semenova Y., Pivina L., Khismetova Z., et al. Anticipating the Need for Healthcare Resources Following the Escalation of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the Republic of Kazakhstan. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(6):387-396. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.395.
9. Alimov D.A., Zhalalov B.Z., Ganiev U.Sh. Stent restenosis from the point of view of endothelial dysfunction. Bulletin of Emergency Medicine, 2017; 3: 109-112 [In Russian].
10. Li M., Hou J., Gu X., et al. Incidence and risk factors of instent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients from southern China. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00640-z.
11. Skorupski W.J., Grygier M., Lesiak M., et al. Coronary Stent Thrombosis in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported Worldwide. Viruses. 2022;14(2):260. doi: 10.3390/v14020260.
12. Giustino G., Croft L.B., Stefanini G.G., et al. Characterization of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(18):2043-2055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.069.
13. O’Shea P.M., Lee G.R., Griffin T.P., et al. COVID-19 in adults: test menu for hospital blood science laboratories. Ir J Med Sci. 2020;189(4):1147-1152. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02252-0.
14. Neumann J.T., Twerenbold R., Weimann J., et al. Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Population. JAMA. 2024;331(22):1898-1909. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5596.
15. Lala A., Johnson K.W., Russak A.J., et al. 2020. Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 76(5):533-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.007.
16. Gupta A.K., Jneid H., Addison D., et al. 2020. Current perspectives on coronavirus disease 2019 and cardiovascular disease: A white paper by the JAHA editors. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9:e017013 doi: 10.1161.JAHA.120.017013.
17. Eljilany I., Elzouki A.N. D-Dimer, Fibrinogen, and IL-6 in COVID-19 Patients with Suspected Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020;16:455-462.
18. Pepys M.B. C-reactive protein predicts outcome in COVID-19: is it also a therapeutic target? Eur Heart J. 2021;42(23):2280- 2283. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab169.
19. Smilowitz N.R., Kunichoff D., Garshick M., et al. C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(23):2270-2279. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1103.
20. Hanley B, Lucas SB, Youd E, et al. Autopsy in suspected COVID-19 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73:239–242. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206522.
21. Tian S, Xiong Y, Liu H, et al. Pathological study of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) through postmortem core biopsies. Mod Pathol 2020. 33:1007–14. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0536-x.
22. Zhang C, Shi L, Wang FS. Liver injury in COVID-19: management and challenges. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:428–430. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30057-1.
23. Hunter CA, Jones SA. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:448–457. doi: 10.1038/ni.3153.
24. Wang Y., Shi L., Wang Y., et al. An updated meta-analysis of AST and ALT levels and the mortality of COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;40:208-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.063.
25. Yong S.J., Halim A., Halim M., et al. Inflammatory and vascular biomarkers in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 20 biomarkers. Rev Med Virol. 2023;33(2):e2424. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2424.
26. Prieto-Lobato A., Ramos-Martínez R., Vallejo-Calcerrada N., et al. A Case Series of Stent Thrombosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2(9):1291-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.024.
27. Richardson S., Hirsch J.S., Narasimhan M., et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052-2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
28. Guo T., Fan Y., Chen M., et al. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):811-818. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017.
Review
For citations:
Batenova G.B., Dedov E.I., Orekhov A.Yu., Dyussupov A.A., Ygiyeva D.G., Pivin M.R., Manatova A.M., Pivina L.M. Assessment of the Association Between Clinical and Laboratory Parameters and Past Coronavirus Infection in Patients with Coronary Artery Restenosis. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2025;15(1):42-56. https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2025-15-1-42-56. EDN: NYAGOE