Early Predictors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: Rationale for A Personalized Screening Strategy in The First Trimester
https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2026-16-4-278-283
EDN: DOMKQD
Abstract
To identify early clinical and metabolic predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy and to justify the need for a personalized screening strategy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-control cohort study was conducted at the Multidisciplinary City Hospital No. 2 in Astana (n=600). The main group consisted of 300 pregnant women with GDM, and the control group comprised 300 women with physiological pregnancy. Anthropometric data (BMI), medical history, and laboratory indicators (fasting glucose, HbA1c) recorded at registration (up to 12 weeks) were analyzed. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U-test, odds ratio (OR) calculation, and ROC analysis. Results: Patients with GDM had significantly higher BMI (obesity in 31.0 % vs. 9.0 %, p<0.001) and age. The incidence of preeclampsia in the GDM group was 7.3 % vs. 3.3 % in the control group; it was established that GDM increases the risk of preeclampsia by more than two times(OR=2.295; 95 % CI: 1.067–4.934). ROC analysis revealed high diagnostic value of individual markers in the first trimester. Fasting glucose at a threshold of >4.49 mmol/L showed a sensitivity of 71.6 % and specificity of 76.6 % (AUC=0.787; 95 % CI: 0.745–0.825). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at a level >5.27 % demonstrated a sensitivity of 63.9 % and high specificity of 85.7 % (AUC=0.792; 95 % CI: 0.653–0.894). The developed combined prognostic model (HbA1c + fasting glucose) showed the highest predictive value with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.849, providing a sensitivity of 90.0 % and specificity of 78.2 %. Conclusion: Glycated hemoglobin and fasting glycemia in the first trimester are independent predictors of GDM and associated preeclampsia. Implementing a risk score assessment at the first antenatal visit allows for the identification of a group for early initiation of personalized prevention, without waiting for the standard OGTT timing (24–28 weeks), which may reduce the incidence of obstetric complications.
About the Authors
A. A. YeszhanovaRussian Federation
Aliya A. Yeszhanova — Assistant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Astana
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that this work, its topic, subject matter, and content do not affect any competing interests
M. A. Beketova
Russian Federation
Beketova Makpal Amanbaevna — Master of Science in Medicine, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Astana
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that this work, its topic, subject matter, and content do not affect any competing interests
References
1. Chivese T., Hoegfeldt C.A., Werfalli M., et al. The prevalence of pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy — A systematic review and metaanalysis of studies published during 2010–2020. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109049. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109049.
2. Eades C.E., Burrows K.A., Andreeva R., et. al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes in the United States and Canada: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06378-2.
3. Xie J., Wang M., Long Z., et al. Global burden of type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults, 1990–2019: systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. BMJ. 2022;379:e072385. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072385.
4. Pace R., Brazeau A.-S., Meltzer S., et al. Conjoint associations of gestational diabetes and hypertension with diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease in parents: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(10):1115–1124. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx263
5. Hoodbhoy Z., Mohammed N., Nathani K.R., et al. The impact of maternal preeclampsia and hyperglycemia on the cardiovascular health of the offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(4):363–374. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728823
6. McIntyre H.D., Kapur A., Divakar H., et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus — Innovative approach to prediction, diagnosis, management, and prevention of future NCD-mother and offspring. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:614533. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.614533
7. Osmundson S.S., Zhao B., Kunz L., et al. First trimester hemoglobin A1c and subsequent gestational diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(10):977–982. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1581055.
8. Poon LC, McIntyre HD, Hyett JA, et al.. The first-trimester of pregnancy — A window of opportunity for prediction and prevention of pregnancy complications and future life. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;145:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.
9. Benhalima K., Minschart C., Van Crombrugge P., et al. The 2024 Flemish consensus on screening for gestational diabetes mellitus early and later in pregnancy. Acta Clin Belg. 2024;79(3):217–224. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2024.2384258
10. Davidson K.W., Barry M.J., Mangione C.M., et al. Aspirin Use to Prevent Preeclampsia and Related Morbidity and Mortality: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;326(12):1186-1191. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14781.
Review
For citations:
Yeszhanova A.A., Beketova M.A. Early Predictors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: Rationale for A Personalized Screening Strategy in The First Trimester. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2026;16(4):278-283. https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2026-16-4-278-283. EDN: DOMKQD
JATS XML




































