EXPERIENCE LONG-TERM USE OF INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON COUNTER PULSATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2016-6-4-70-71
Abstract
The report presents two clinical cases of acute coronary syndrome complicated by the development of cardiogenic shock. For hemodynamic stabilization prolonged intraaortic balloon counterpulsation was conducted.
About the Authors
V. V. Rezvan
First Moscow State Medical University na I.M. Sechenov, Department of Hospital Therapy № 2 Moscow, Russia
Medical Faculty; Hospital for War Veterans № 3 city health department, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. Y. Spirochkin
First Moscow State Medical University na I.M. Sechenov, Department of Hospital Therapy № 2 Moscow, Russia
Medical Faculty; Hospital for War Veterans № 3 city health department, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Magnitsky
First Moscow State Medical University na I.M. Sechenov, Department of Hospital Therapy № 2 Moscow, Russia
Medical Faculty; Hospital for War Veterans № 3 city health department, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. N. Rumyantsev
First Moscow State Medical University na I.M. Sechenov, Department of Hospital Therapy № 2 Moscow, Russia
Medical Faculty; Hospital for War Veterans № 3 city health department, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1.
2. Kantrowitz A., Tjonneland S., Freed P.S. et al. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 1968; 203: 113–118.
3. Scheidt S., Wilner G., Mueller H. et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 1973; 288: 979–984.
4. Kern M.J., Aguirre F., Bach R. et al. Augmentation of coronary blood flow by intraaortic balloon pumping in patients after coronary angio-plasty. Circulation. 1993; 87: 500–511.
5. Bouki K.P., Pavlakis G., Papasteriadis E. Management of cardiogenic shock due to acutecoronary syndromes. Angiology. 2005; 56: 123–130.
6. Sjauw K.D., Engstrom A.E., Henriques J.P. Percutaneous mechanical cardiac assist in myocardial infarction. Where are we now, where are we going? Acute Card. Care. 2007; 9: 222–230.
7. Thiele H., Smalling R.W., Schuler G.C. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acutemyocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur. Heart J. 2007; 28: 2057–2063.
8. Thiele H., Sick P., Boudriot E. et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device inpatients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur. Heart J. 2005; 26: 1276–1283.
Review
For citations:
Rezvan V.V., Spirochkin D.Y., Magnitsky A.V., Rumyantsev O.N. EXPERIENCE LONG-TERM USE OF INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON COUNTER PULSATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2016;6(4):70-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2016-6-4-70-71
Views:
1024
Email this article 