Preview

The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine

Advanced search

Characteristics of The Neuropsychiatric Phenotype of Postcovid Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2025-15-5-346-357

EDN: NAVYDB

Abstract

Aim. To study the characteristics of the neuropsychiatric phenotype of postCOVID syndrome in COVID-19 convalescents. Materials and methods. A sample of 270 COVID-19 convalescents (mean age — 53.2±13.2, (n=130, 48.1 % men)): 62 (23.0 %) without postCOVID syndrome and 208 (77.0 %) with postCOVID syndrome. In the subgroup with postCOVID syndrome, 134 (64.4 %) convalescents had a neuropsychiatric phenotype. The study took into account medical history data, assessed the neuropsychiatric status on the following scales: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), all patients were consulted by a neurologist, a somnologist and a therapist. Results. The structure of the neuropsychiatric phenotype: insomnia (n=74, 55.2 %), severe asthenia (MFI-20 scale, n=55, 41.0 %), anxiety and depression (HADS scale, n=37, 27.6 %, n=32, 23.9 %, respectively), anosmia/dysosmia (n=13.9.7 %), ageusia/dysgeusia (n=6, 4.5 %). According to the SF-36 questionnaire, in the group of people with a neuropsychiatric phenotype, a marked decrease in indicators was detected in all subscales. According to the SCL-90-R questionnaire, the group with the neuropsychiatric phenotype showed a marked increase in all subscales. The following features were noted in women with a neuropsychiatric phenotype: indicators were lower on the scales: physical functioning by 1.1 times (p=0.017), role-playing functioning due to physical condition by 1.6 times (p=0.031) (SF-36 scale), indicators of obsessive-compulsive disorder by 1.7 times higher (p=0.028), depression 1.5 times (p=0.005), anxiety 2 times (p=0.017) (SCL-90 scale), according to the results of the HADS scale assessment, the incidence of depression in women with the neuropsychiatric phenotype of postCOVID syndrome is 3 times higher (p=0.043) compared with men, having the same phenotype. Conclusion. The neuropsychiatric phenotype of postCOVID syndrome is characterized by the presence of insomnia, severe asthenia, anxiety, depressive disorders, anosmia/dysosmia, and ageusia/dysgeusia. Individuals with a neuropsychiatric phenotype have reduced indicators of quality of life and the level of psychological well-being of the individual in all subscales, according to the SF-36 and SCL-90-R questionnaires. The incidence of neuropsychiatric phenotype, as well as the severity of psychopathological symptoms, is higher in the group of women.

About the Authors

V. V. Zorina
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian branches of the Russian Academy of S ciences»
Russian Federation

Valentina V. Zorina — Junior Researcher, Sector for the Study of Monogenic Forms of Common Human Diseases

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



A. A. Karaseva
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Alexandra A. Karaseva — Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic and Environmental Determinants of the Human Life Cycle

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



E. V. Garbuzova
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Evgeniya V. Garbuzova — PhD, Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic and Environmental Determinants of the Human Life Cycle

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



A. D. Afanasyeva
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Alena D. Afanasyeva — MD, PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Genetic and Environmental Determinants of the Human Life Cycle

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



S. V. Duma
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Svetlana N. Duma — MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Psychological and Sociological Problems of Internal Diseases; Head of the Consultative and Diagnostic Department

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



A. V Sukhanov
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Sukhanov — MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Psychological and Sociological Problems of Therapeutic Diseases

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



E. V. Shakhtschneider
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian branches of the Russian Academy of S ciences»; Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Elena V. Shakhtshneider — MD, PhD, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Molecular Genetic Studies of Therapeutic Diseases; Head of the Sector for the Study of Monogenic Forms of Common Human Diseases

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



I. I. Logvinenko
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Irina I. Logvinenko — MD, Professor, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, Deputy Head for Medical Work

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



Yu. I. Ragino
Scientific Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine is a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation

Yulia I. Ragino — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interests



References

1. Boesl F., Audebert H., Endres M. et al. A neurological outpatient clinic for patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome — a report on the clinical presentations of the first 100 patients. Front. Neurol. 2021; 16(12):738405. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.738405.

2. Ceban F., Ling S., Lui L.M.W. et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022; 101:93-135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020

3. Huang C., Huang L., Wang Y. et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397(10270):220–232. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8

4. Munblit D., Bobkova P., Spiridonova E. et al. Incidence and risk factors for persistent symptoms in adults previously hospitalised for COVID-19. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021;51(9):1107–1120. doi: 10.1111/cea.13997

5. Sigfrid L., Drake T.M., Pauley E. et al. Long COVID in adults discharged from UK hospitals after Covid-19: a prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021; 8:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100186

6. Augustin M., Schommers P., Stecher M., et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;18(6):100122. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100122

7. Rogers J.P., Chesney E., Oliver D. et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7: 611–627. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0

8. Premraj L., Kannapadi N.V., Briggs J. et al. Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2022; 15(434):120162. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162

9. Soriano J.B., Murthy S., Marshall J.C. et al. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 22(4): e102-e107. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9

10. Dedov I.I., Mokrysheva N.G., Mel’nichenko G.A. et al. Obesity. Clinical recommendations. Consilium Medicum-Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23(4): 311–325 [in Russian]. doi: 10.26442/20751753.2021.4.200832

11. Ware J. E, Snow K.K., Kosinski M. et al. Sf-36 Health Survey. Manuel and Interpretation Guide, Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated. 2000: 150.

12. Tarabrina N.V. Workshop on the psychology of post-traumatic stress. SPb., Peter.2001; 272 p. [in Russian].

13. DeRogatis L.R. SCL-90-R: administration, scoring and procedures. Manual 1. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1977:4-8

14. Zigmond, A. S., Snaith, R. P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

15. Tian J., Hong J.S. Application of the Chinese version of the MFI-20 in detecting the severe fatigue in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(8):2217-23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1783-x.

16. Amin M.T., Fatema K., Arefin S. et al. Obesity, a major risk factor for immunity and severe outcomes of COVID-19. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(8):BSR20210979. doi: 10.1042/BSR20210979

17. Vas P., Hopkins D., Feher M. et al. Diabetes, obesity and COVID-19: A complex interplay. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(10):1892–1896. doi: 10.1111/dom.14134

18. Hu J., Jolkkonen J., Zhao C. Neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 and its neuropathological alterations: Similarities with other coronaviruses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020; 119:184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.012

19. Yang J., Li Y., Wang S. et al. The SARS-CoV-2 main protease induces neurotoxic TDP-43 cleavage and aggregates. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):109. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01386-8

20. Rachin A.P., Kotova O.V., Demyanovskaya E.G. et al. COVID-19 and covid syndrome. Neurologist’s Guide. M., ABC-press. 2023; 96 p. [in Russian]

21. Premraj L., Kannapadi N.V., Briggs J. et al. Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2022; 15(434):120162. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162

22. Buttery S., Philip K.E.J., Williams P. et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021;8(1):e001075. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001075

23. Mazza M.G., Palladini M., De Lorenzo R. et al. Persistent psychopathology and neurocognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: effect of inflammatory biomarkers at three-month follow-up. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021;94:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.02.021.

24. Van den Borst B., Peters J.B., Brink M. et al. Comprehensive health assessment three months after recovery from acute COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis . 2021; 73(5):e1089-e1098. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1750.

25. Morin L., Savale L., Pham T. et al. Four-month clinical status of a cohort of patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2021;(325):1525–1534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3331

26. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Palacios-Ceña M. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Previously Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022, 19(15):9273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159273

27. Bai F., Tomasoni D., Falcinella C. et al. Female gender is associated with long COVID syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(4):611.e9-611.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.002.

28. Huang Y., Zhao N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 12(288):112954. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954

29. Frontera J.A., Yang D., Lewis A. et al. A prospective study of long-term outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without neurological complications. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021;426 doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117486

30. D’Hondt S., Gisle L., De Pauw R. et al. Long-term neurological manifestations of COVID-19: prevalence and predictive factors. Neurol. Sci. 2021;42(12):4903–4907. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05586-4

31. Khan S.A., Ashkar R., Kumari S. et al. Long COVID syndrome: psychological and sexual dysfunction among survivors of COVID-19 infection. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(10):4788-4793. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001153.

32. Merikanto I., Dauvilliers Y., Chung F. et al. Sleep symptoms are essential features of long-COVID — Comparing healthy controls with COVID-19 cases of different severity in the international COVID sleep study (ICOSS-II). J Sleep Res. 2023 Feb;32(1):e13754. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13754.

33. Sokolova L.P., Staryh E.V. Asthenic syndrome in general therapeutic practice. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova . 2022;122(4):44-51. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202212204144.

34. Wulf Hanson S., Abbafati C., Aerts J.G et al. With Persistent Fatigue, Cognitive, and Respiratory Symptom Clusters Following Symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021. 2022;328(16):1604-1615. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18931.

35. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C., Palacios-Ceña D., Gómez-Mayordomo V. et al. Long-term post-COVID symptoms and associated risk factors in previously hospitalized patients: A multicenter study. J. Infect. 2021;83(2):237–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.036

36. Diez-Cirarda M., Yus-Fuertes M., Polidura C. et al. Share Neural basis of fatigue in post-COVID syndrome and relationships with cognitive complaints and cognition. 2024;340:116113. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116113.

37. Augustin M., Schommers P., Stecher M. et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;6:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100122.


Review

For citations:


Zorina V.V., Karaseva A.A., Garbuzova E.V., Afanasyeva A.D., Duma S.V., Sukhanov A.V., Shakhtschneider E.V., Logvinenko I.I., Ragino Yu.I. Characteristics of The Neuropsychiatric Phenotype of Postcovid Syndrome. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2025;15(5):346-357. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20514/2226-6704-2025-15-5-346-357. EDN: NAVYDB

Views: 20


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-6704 (Print)
ISSN 2411-6564 (Online)